When a manufacturer’s disclaimer states that parts are not qualified for space applications (e.g., SmallSats), and your designers include those parts in units, what technical data do you use to substantiate their use?
There may be occasions where a part not intended for space use possesses sufficiently attractive functionality, performance, cost and/or availability benefits that make it a candidate for a particular space mission. This may or may not present significant risk. Independent testing under conditions representative of the actual mission, very conservative redundancy schemes, or performing worst-case, combined effects (e.g., electrical, thermal, radiation, vibration) analyses based on measured data, may be options that can increase confidence in the parts.